Some of you may be familiar with people who call themselves “trads”. Trad is short for “traditionalist”, and often what they are traditional about is faith and home, or marriage (or some romanticised version of the above).
But some do take it further, and seem to look back a thousand years through rose colored glasses to their ideal. Like this guy:
One gets the sense most of the people pushing this trad vision are men. That's not to say there are not women who celebrate the tradwife role: they enjoy being homemakers and mothers. Their “traditional” though is usually fixed somewhere in the modern sphere. They want to stay at home with their children, not live without running water or electricity.
But it's the men who tend to go much further with their tradvision having this rather quaintly soft-focused vision of some preindustrial idyll, in which one lived completely in harmony with the rhythms of the season and with one's neighbors. You’d be harvesting grain, wooing ladies, and somehow spending each afternoon lounging in a meadow and drinking mead.
It’s the next level of the rural fantasy wouldn’t it be nice to live on a farm? that many daydreaming cityfolk have, cranked up to wouldn’t it be nice to live on a farm in the 11th century? This vision of rural life is only a thing for urban dwellers.
While I may enjoy some elements of rural living, like horse riding, there's a lot to be said for living in a world with antibiotics. And I think some understanding of that reality is perhaps what makes fewer women go in for this trad peasant fantasy.
It seems to be mostly men who feel that somehow they would have been winners in a more patriarchal world, but it's like men who fantasize about polygamy thinking that everyone gets four wives. No: rich men get four wives, most men (including you) get no wife.
And as it is with this visions of pleasant peasantry: the unpleasant realities are somehow shaded out. In truth life for medieval peasants was hard. Aside from the limitations of technology, there were the hard realities of society.
An element of these trad fantasis is the notion that things were better in the past because of “traditional” values or Christianity, making people behave better. In truth medieval Europe was full of violence (including a murder rate far higher than today), capricious leaders, and regular unrest. Anyone living back then would trade their lives for ours in a heartbeat.
But this urge to idealize the past is a regular feature of industrial and postindustrial world. We saw it in the nineteenth century. In the wake of the Industrial Revolution, the dark satanic mills, many artists and thinkers started to idealize the medieval period.
This resulted in the gothic revival of nineteenth-century architecture, and literature playing up medieval folklore and culture. Artists and designers of the Arts & Crafts movement tried to hark back to preindustrial techniques and aesthetics.
The nineteenth century was a period of a lot of inventing traditions, and establishing practices that are now looked back on as timeless. Many of what we think of as ancient folkways were invented or revived at this time.
A smaller wave of this took place in the 1960s and 70s, a response to the dislocations of the postwar period. From back-to-the-landers to people wanting to rediscover traditional handicrafts, to medieval influences on fashion and music.
Fantasies of the past recur in a range of discourses, all with their own particular “good old days”, whether it’s men who think women should staying in the kitchen, or anti-GMO food types talking about how before pesticides people were healthier.
It's all crap. Biological anthropologists will tell you the number of diseases and illness we can see on the bones of people who died centuries ago. The human body is a frail vessel. And that has not changed.
But the idea that if we lived in another time, somehow things will be better is one that keeps recurring. We cannot escape from ourselves so we build a better world in an imaginary past.
Other news:
I have an etsy shop! Come and visit.
Where else I’ve been:
I reviewed Oliver Bullough’s Butler to the World for the Spectator.
I know I'm real late, but....Thank you for this! I think the more comfortable our material lives have become, the harder it is to even recognize all we moderns have going for us, and imagine that having almost all your babies that grow up, for instance, is a normal feature of reality, not a hard victory that took many generations to win. Clean water is not normal; dying of dysentery is. But in a world where no one even knows a story about a baby dying of dysentery, and where we hazily elide the 1940s and 1840s (I stumbled on this post through this one of yours: https://fieldnotes.katrinagulliver.com/p/who-is-this-woman), I think it's very easy to imagine the more distant past as just like today, in its presence of clean water and its absence of body lice, but different because....um, social values and people had more leisure time, probably? Because, um, people in the past didn't have to file these TPS reports, and how long could threshing wheat actually take?
I feel like a real traditionalist, who wants to honor the past and knows enough about it to be able to legitimately do so, should feel nothing but gratitude at, for instance, vaccinations and washing machines. Our ancestors died for a world where most babies grow up; we are betraying their memory by pretending that their sacrifice for the brilliant world we live in today didn't happen.
It's interesting, I have often percieved a lot of the trad culture stuff as being primarily feminine, as in the tradwife: https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/tradwife-gen-z
Here in America (I think you are in the UK, I am not sure), there is quite a culture of religious women embracing domesticity and a sort of back to traditional values lifestyle. On the lefty end of the spectrum, there is a whole hippie culture of embracing back-to-the-land agricultural practices, though their sexual, gender, and economic policies are often quite different. At any rate, there are all kinds of lifestyle blogs around this kind of thing, usually written by women.
And of course there are the anarcho-primitivists on the left, who literally (I think) want to return to being hunter-gatherers, or maybe only gatherers, because some of them are vegan. Those tend to be men, from what I've observed.
I myself often have quite a bit of nostalgia for earlier, pre-modern times, as I suppose does anyone who is interested in history. That is not to say that I would want to give up all my modern amenities (not to mention human rights) to go back. But I do think there's a lot we could learn from earlier eras and incorporate into our present lives, and we may well have to, in the face of climate change and the decline of oil production.